I've played a bit and noticed it was possible to use '.' in cmd-names. Is that intentional, will future implementations of UCMDs also support that? Or did it just 'slip through'?
(Actually I like that, it enabled me to build some nice commands ;-))
UCMDs: naming of commands...
Re: UCMDs: naming of commands...
This behaviour is intentional and allows you to group your names into groups, e.g. gx.cmda, gx.cmdb, etc.
Re: UCMDs: naming of commands...
Cool - thanks :-)