Which doesn't make any sense to me.... I was expecting a similar vector as from the first display output, instead I get a nested vector... What is the correct way to structure this to get the output I want? (i.e. a vector containing three elements just like what I'd have if I ran togethers ← ones twos ones)
(Sorry for yet another question... I am searching and researching all the resources I have/can find...)
Hi Conor, The juxtaposition of two arrays produces a 2-item vector, which is what you got with the two arrays: together ones. I wonder if the following sequence helps: